So the next drawing is the situation in which this “focusing surface effect” found itself:
As we can see, the focusing surface, even if it’s not standing in a main event expanding effect trajectory, is still subjected to its “inner centrifugal effect” of the space volume it occupies. And we can clearly observe that this “centrifugal effect” is pulling at each faces of the “focusing surface”.
So we can imagine what happened, afterward, to this “focusing surface”. Let’s see it in another drawing:
A) This part of the drawing represents the moment when both faces of our focusing surface are ripped from each other by its inner “centrifugal effect”.
Having lost their resistance on one side, their “focusing effect” toward their center, made both faces recoil on themselves producing two “focusing volumes”.
B) And since the diameter of the former surface of 10^-35 meter was the shortest length possible to exists, it had to keep the same diameter for each new produced volume.
C) Two volumes replacing one surface, inside the original space volume, made this space volume inflate significantly in one shot (it, at least, double it). This is what started “inflation”.
D) So we, now, can “date” this inflation event at 10^-36 second after time = zero (third space reproduction), as when inflation started. We will see that this inflation was far from ended.
But this isn’t all we find; we can also identify the initial “focusing surface effect” that transformed itself into two “focussing volumes”. The “focussing surface effect” is the boson we call a Gluon, which “decays”, 75% of the time, into a Top and antiTop quarks (the fact is that those first gluons decayed 100% of the time; but later on, a second generation of gluons were produced during the decaying process).
Furthermore, we now can understand why a gluon doesn’t seem to have “mass”; simply because it’s a bi-dimensional “surface” and “mass” is limited to three-dimensional “volumes”.
As for the other “quasi-particle”, also without mass, related to the “expanding motion” of our universe, I’m tempted to identify it with the neutrino that travels at “almost” the speed of light. The main reason I identify it so, is that its “helicity” is “left handed” which means that it “spins” in the contrary direction of its motion’s trajectory. Which is the normal result from the counterclockwise rotation projected by the “centrifugal effect” from Planck era.
We are now confronted to a very important question that science was able to answer recently with one of their “model”, naming: the origin of “mass”. They used the “Higgs field” model to explain the process.
I must say that no one can verbalise clearly what this process is. Only “mathematicians” say they really can understand it mathematically.
We will answer the same question with my “T Model” that wants to be accessible to everybody.
Comentarios